Compare · Video
Wan 2.7 vs Veo 3.1
Specs, pricing, and capabilities side by side — plus outputs generated from identical prompts, so the only variable between the columns is the model.
Cloud
Remove from comparison
Alibaba's open-weight Wan 2.7 video model (27B MoE) generating clips with synchronized audio from text or images.
Learn more about Wan 2.7 →Cloud
Remove from comparison
Google's high-quality video model with native audio, reference-image support, and frame-to-frame control.
Learn more about Veo 3.1 →Overview
Creator
Alibaba
Google
Available on
ReplicateRunware
ReplicateRunware
Model ID
wan-2.7-video
google/veo-3.1
Specs
Pricing
$0.10 per second
$0.20 per second
Max resolution
1080p
1080p
Aspect ratios
16:9, 9:16, 1:1 +2 more
16:9, 9:16
Audio
Synchronized track
Synchronized track
Image-to-video
Start frame
Start & end frame + reference images
Seed control
Supported
Supported
Clip length
—
Up to 8s
Negative prompt
—
Supported
Samples
Establishing shotCamera motion, scene coherence over time
PromptSlow aerial push in over a coastal cliff road at golden hour, waves breaking on rocks below, a single car travelling along the road. Smooth continuous camera movement, warm cinematic colour grade.
Close-upFluid motion, fine detail, temporal stability
PromptClose-up of a barista pouring steamed milk into an espresso, latte art forming in the crema, steam rising from the cup. Shallow depth of field, soft window light, subtle handheld movement.
Every sample is the model’s first result for the shared scene prompt — no cherry-picking — generated via Replicate or Runware. Hover a copy icon to read the full prompt.
Popular comparisons
Claude Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SolGemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT 5.6 SolClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGPT 5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.3Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashNano Banana 2 vs GPT Image 2Flux 2 Pro vs Seedream 5 ProSeedream 5 Pro vs Nano Banana 2Eleven v3 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash TTSLyria 3 vs Music 2.6Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1Veo 3.1 vs Kling 3.0Kling 3.0 vs Gen-4.5