Google Gemma 4 E4B
Google's efficient 4B multimodal model — stronger reasoning than E2B with text, image, and audio.
Gemma 4 E4B is an open-weight text model built by Google. It is multimodal: alongside a text prompt it accepts images, then replies with generated text. It runs entirely on your own hardware through Ollama: no API key and no per-use fees.
- Released
- Apr 2026
- Pricing
- Free, runs on your hardware
- Inputs
- Text, Images
Samples
Generated with Gemma 4 E4B via Ollama. The same three prompts run against every text model in the catalog, shown verbatim, so the only thing that changes between two models’ answers is the model.
Explain what an API is to someone who has never written code. Do not use a restaurant or waiter analogy. Plain prose only — no headings, bullet points, or markdown formatting. Maximum 50 words.
An API is a set of rules and protocols that allows different software applications to talk to each other. It defines how they should request and exchange data, ensuring one system can access information from another in a predictable and structured way.
A two-person startup is deciding whether to build their own user authentication or use a hosted provider. Give them a clear recommendation, then the single strongest argument against your own recommendation. Plain prose only — no headings, bullet points, or markdown formatting. Maximum 150 words.
They should use a hosted provider for authentication. Building your own system introduces massive security risk and requires diverting critical engineering time away from developing core, unique features that will actually drive customer value. Managed services handle compliance, evolving threats, and scaling concerns, allowing the two founders to focus entirely on product-market fit. The single strongest argument against this approach is the potential long-term vendor lock-in, meaning their application becomes heavily dependent on the provider's pricing and API structure, which could become prohibitively expensive or restrictive as they grow.
Write a briefing for a non-technical executive explaining why their company's spending on AI is hard to predict, and what they can do about it. Cover at least three distinct causes. Plain prose only — no headings, bullet points, or markdown formatting. Write exactly 205 words.
Predicting the costs associated with artificial intelligence is exceptionally difficult because the field is evolving so rapidly. The underlying technology is constantly changing, meaning what we budgeted for today might be obsolete tomorrow, forcing unexpected investment in newer, more efficient models. Secondly, the integration process itself is a wild variable; scaling an AI tool from a small pilot to an enterprise-wide solution requires massive, often unforeseen infrastructure overhauls and specialized data cleanup, which adds unpredictable costs. A third major factor is the sheer volatility of specialized talent. AI experts are in massive demand globally, and securing top-tier engineers or data scientists often involves competitive bidding wars that lead to sudden and significant salary inflation, completely destabilizing traditional human capital budgeting. To manage this uncertainty, the company should shift its focus from fixed annual spending to agile, phased investments. This means treating AI implementation as a series of controlled experiments rather than a monolithic project. Regularly establishing a governance council comprised of both technical and business leaders will ensure that investment decisions are continually validated against measurable business outcomes, allowing us to adjust our spending proactively rather than reactively when unexpected expenses arise.
Google and Google DeepMind build the Gemini family of multimodal models, the Imagen and Nano Banana image models, the Lyria music models, and the Veo video models.
deepmind.google ↗Google's flagship reasoning model for complex software engineering, deep mathematical and scientific problem solving and autonomous multi-step agents, with a shared 1M-token context.
Google's most capable Flash model, with clear gains over 3.7 Flash in software engineering, agentic tasks, and multi-step reasoning, plus vision and a 1M-token context window.
Google's most efficient multimodal Flash model: an updated reasoning stack with stronger coding and computer-use quality, at the same speed and scale as the rest of the Flash line.
Google's most capable multimodal model with deep reasoning and 1M token context.
Google's 26B mixture-of-experts model with long context and strong multimodal reasoning.
Google's flagship 31B dense model with 256K context and top-tier text and image understanding.